Appearance
Product Design & Development
This page is generated. Do not edit it by hand — run
scripts/atlas-vocab.py.
tier 0 · 0 pieces of work carry it · 3 crafts it is confused with
The craft, and who hires it
A brand hires this to make or remake the product itself — a new app or platform (UX & research, human-centered design, design systems, development), an industrial-design program for hardware, prototyping & engineering; bought from digital-product agencies and industrial-design firms as multi-quarter build engagements.
The service tier for designing and building the client's own PRODUCT: digital product design and engineering (the Work & Co / Instrument 'digital product agency' offering — UX & research, design systems, build), industrial/physical product design, and prototyping & engineering. The product being made is the client's shipping thing, not a marketing asset about it. [CS1 credit-only 2026-07-18: childless service tier — exists for the credit graph / vendor-offering menu (P0-11), not content classification; do NOT invent leaves under it from a census read. Strategy-leaf mirrors ride chunk 3 per the CS1 proposal.]
Tag it when…
Credit/vendor grain only: tag when a credited vendor sells product creation — digital product design/engineering, industrial design, prototyping, UX & research — as its engagement, i.e. the deliverable is the client's own product or its design system.
Never tag it when…
Never tag content items at this level (SERVICES-vs-CRAFT boundary law; childless service = credit/offer tier only). UI/product-design CRAFT visible in an asset tags active Design leaves (design_ui_design 'UI Design', design_product_design 'Product Design'; note design_ux_design is retired/is_active=false — never tag it) on the content — a product-UI showcase film is still film/motion craft plus those Design tags, never this service. Marketing experiences (campaign sites, activations' digital layer) credit svc_digital_interactive, not here.
Easily mistaken for 3 other crafts
Every other page suggests neighbours by similarity. This one navigates by difference: each line names the craft this is confused with, and the rule for telling them apart.
- design ui design / design product design (Design L2 leaves) — The Design leaves tag CONTENT that exhibits product-design craft (a UI walkthrough, a hero render of the device); this service credits the VENDOR hired to build the product. An asset about a product never pulls this service tag.
- svc digital interactive — Both build digital things: this service builds the client's shipping PRODUCT (app, platform, device); Digital & Interactive builds brand/marketing EXPERIENCES (campaign sites, immersive activations). Ask: does the deliverable outlive the campaign as the product itself?
- svc creative production — Creative Production makes marketing/creative assets; this service makes the product those assets are about. The film ABOUT the app credits Creative Production; the app credits here.
At what size it applies
Credit grain only — vendor-offering/credit menu tier; content items never tag this level.
Where to look next
- The whole services tree — the services index.
- Every other vocabulary — the vocabulary index.
- How work gets credited to a craft — the entities chapter.